+- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl)
+-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html)
+--- Thread: [MW] Vs [GSE] (/thread-6017.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - theInfamous - 02-10-2008
(02-10-2008, 09:41 PM)Halo link Wrote: lol really?
No not really, because
- 1. It was not official, and
- 2. there was no neutral person to write down the kills/deaths of both gangs/clans.
+ [BB] was fighting aside [W].
Anyways, nice work [MW].
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - HaZe - 02-10-2008
[W] + [BB] = 10
[H] = 14
it was 10 vs 14 (yes, i looked at /gangs) so you guys still had the advantage. even before that there was 6 of us and we slapped you guys. and at least it was only 1 gang that we helped, unlike about 3 gangs (like you guys did)
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - Halo - 02-10-2008
ok ok back to topic MW please
MW sorry for the inconvinience
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - theInfamous - 02-10-2008
(02-10-2008, 10:06 PM)HaZe link Wrote: [W] + [BB] = 10
[H] = 14
it was 10 vs 14 (yes, i looked at /gangs) so you guys still had the advantage. even before that there was 6 of us and we slapped you guys. and at least it was only 1 gang that we helped, unlike about 3 gangs (like you guys did)
Dude.. 3/4th of our members are still recruits, they need to learn everything about lead aiming etc.
Most of them have been accepted less than 2 weeks ago.
So it was (at least) 5 'hardcore' [H] fighters and [W] + [BB] = 10 'hardcore' fighters.
That ain't fair, so.. take a look at this pic:
[img]http://valiante.plugnpay.com/scstore/graphics/Amazingly%20I%20Don't%20Give%20A%20Shit%20Large.jpg[/img]
Back on topic.
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - Maddolis - 02-11-2008
(02-10-2008, 10:06 PM)HaZe link Wrote: [W] + [BB] = 10
[H] = 14
it was 10 vs 14 (yes, i looked at /gangs) so you guys still had the advantage. even before that there was 6 of us and we slapped you guys. and at least it was only 1 gang that we helped, unlike about 3 gangs (like you guys did)
Started closer to 6 v 12 v 7, W|BB v H+PG v HC4L.
But [W] doesn't need to prove itself for [H] (and both W and H are irrelevant to this topic), so no further arguments required.
We'll see who the bystanders believe when they get destroyed by [W] before H has a chance to rally the troops.
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - HaZe - 02-11-2008
(02-11-2008, 07:51 AM)Maddolis link Wrote: Started closer to 6 v 12 v 7, W|BB v H+PG v HC4L.co-signed
But [W] doesn't need to prove itself for [H] (and both W and H are irrelevant to this topic), so no further arguments required.
We'll see who the bystanders believe when they get destroyed by [W] before H has a chance to rally the troops.
anyway, nice job blaz3r/mitch on your win
Re: [MW] Vs [GSE] - Juice - 02-11-2008
Nice video.