![]() |
|
GTA 4 discussion - Printable Version +- Las Venturas Playground (https://forum.sa-mp.nl) +-- Forum: Miscellaneous (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: General Talk (https://forum.sa-mp.nl/forum-24.html) +--- Thread: GTA 4 discussion (/thread-681.html) |
Re: GTA 4 discussion - Maka - 04-26-2007 Nah i would stay with Sa-Mp, cuz it'll take very long i think for 4-MP, and i like SanAndreas ![]() one question, in what year will it play? like Vice City '86 , and SA '92 (my birthyear )anyway ; it'll rock but i think i'm just gonna buy it for ps3 and not for PC Re: GTA 4 discussion - Ben - 04-26-2007 just for ps3? you know how much they cost!!!! Re: GTA 4 discussion - Turkey - 04-26-2007 (04-26-2007, 04:54 PM)benbmyers link Wrote:good graphics can only make a game good for so long...Oh really? B) Then tell me why cs 1.6 with hl1 (1999) graphics is more popular than cs source with hl2 (2004-5) graphics. ![]() What you said is really not true... ![]() Re: GTA 4 discussion - Ben - 04-26-2007 i have no idea what that means turkeystar* but i mean that i have be disapointed by many gta games in the past, so even if the graphics are the best of the best, without a good storyline or long story line i will be disapointed
Re: GTA 4 discussion - tomozj - 04-27-2007 A game is easily ruined by a crap engine. That's what's made the GTA games the best - the engine. It's really smooth and easy to use, whereas games like Driver3's movement is really stuff and unnatural. As Rockstar are rewriting the GTA engine, there's a risk of a big messup. But, judging on what reviewers say, it sounds as if Rockstar have done it right. I don't think they'd ever release a GTA with a fucked up engine. They'd never be able to recover. -tj Re: GTA 4 discussion - Ben - 04-27-2007 never played vice city stories then eh?
Re: GTA 4 discussion - Jay - 04-27-2007 Vice City stories? what about it? Vice City Stories Is one of the best GTA'S IMO! (04-26-2007, 04:59 PM)Makaveli link Wrote:one question, in what year will it play? l 2007!! Check www.gta4.net Re: GTA 4 discussion - tomozj - 04-27-2007 Possibly 2006, or the future. And, VCS sucked IMO. The engine used in VCS was the same as the rest of the GTAs, so you can't imply that it's different. -tj P.S. I completed VCS in 3 days
Re: GTA 4 discussion - Ben - 04-27-2007 lol, i waited from the whole of september and october to get vcs, then completed it in 4 days, that game was bull shit, wost gta imo Re: GTA 4 discussion - Stef - 04-28-2007 OPM had a preview of GTA4 too ![]() It's another interview with Dan Houser in which is being said the emphasis will be on quality rather then quantity. He also said GTA4 will be a more serious game then the previous ones (which isnt a good thing imo) and you won't be a very, very rich guy at the end. Anyways, read it yourself ![]() http://www.jdrshq.com/opmuk/cover.gif http://www.jdrshq.com/opmuk/1.gif http://www.jdrshq.com/opmuk/2.gif http://www.jdrshq.com/opmuk/3.gif The interview has 14 pages so just change the number in the url
|